Owen Sound: A Four-Year City Business Plan

Home › Appendices › Appendix K

Appendices

Appendix KAccessibility Standards and the Complete Accessible Journey

9,237 words · Mike Seiler · Owen Sound, Ontario

Open in the reader →

Vote on the proposals, hear the audio, read the reviews, search the whole plan.

In this chapter

An accessible feature is not the same as an accessible journey

Accessibility should not begin with:

Does the building have a ramp?

It should begin with:

Can the resident actually complete the journey?

A resident may encounter barriers:

One accessible feature does not make that journey:

A perfectly designed entrance can still fail if:

Accessibility therefore belongs inside:

Not in one:

The governing standard should be:

An accessible feature is not the same as an accessible journey.

A second principle follows:

Build accessibility in before procurement, construction and launch rather than attempting to repair it afterward.

A third principle is:

Temporary accommodation is important, but temporary accommodation should not be mistaken for permanent barrier removal.

A fourth principle is:

Accessibility is a service-quality issue, an infrastructure issue, a dignity issue and a public-governance issue.

K.1Purpose

This appendix establishes the operating accessibility framework for:

The City must comply with:

Compliance is:

But compliance alone should not be treated as proof that:

the complete resident journey works.

K.4Practical Accessibility

The operational question is:

Can a person reasonably obtain the public service with dignity, independence and predictability?

K.5Accessibility Is Not Charity

It is:

K.6Accessibility Is Not Special Treatment

Reasonable accommodation can be necessary to achieve:

K.7Accessibility Is Not One Disability

Accessibility planning should consider a broad range of barriers affecting people with:

K.8Do Not Require Disclosure of Diagnosis

The City generally needs to understand:

what barrier exists and what accommodation is needed

rather than unnecessarily collecting:

K.9Functional Need

Prefer.

K.10Medical Information

Collect only where:

K.11The Complete Accessible Journey

Every public-facing municipal service should be capable of being examined through the following journey:

Discover

Understand

Plan

Travel

Arrive

Enter

Navigate

Use the Service

Communicate

Pay or Complete Transaction

Use Supporting Facilities

Exit

Follow Up

K.12Discover

Can the resident:

K.13Understand

Can the resident understand:

K.14Plan

Can the resident determine:

K.15Travel

Can the resident reasonably:

K.16Arrive

Can the resident move from:

to the entrance?

K.17Enter

Can the resident actually:

the entrance?

K.18Navigate

Can the resident locate:

K.19Use the Service

Can the resident receive the same core municipal service?

K.20Communicate

Can information move effectively:

K.21Complete Transaction

Can the resident:

without an avoidable barrier?

K.22Supporting Facilities

Can the resident access:

K.23Exit

Can the person:

K.24Follow Up

Can the resident:

accessibly?

One barrier can make the entire journey:

K.26Journey Mapping

Major resident services should periodically be tested:

from beginning to end.

K.27Department Map Is Not Journey Map

Departments see:

Resident experiences:

K.28Accessibility Barrier Register

The City should maintain one:

Accessibility Barrier Register.

K.29Register Purpose

To make known barriers:

K.30Barrier Register Fields

For material barriers:

Barrier ID

Service / Asset

Location

Barrier Type

Date Identified

How Identified

Severity

Frequency

Safety Impact

Temporary Accommodation

Permanent Correction

Responsible Department

Estimated Cost

Target Date

Status

Completion Evidence

K.31Barrier Types

Possible:

Physical

Digital

Communication

Transportation

Procedural

Attitudinal

Information

Winter

Emergency

K.32Known Barrier

A confirmed accessibility obstacle.

K.33Suspected Barrier

May require:

K.34Complaint

Can reveal:

K.35Complaint Is Not Required

The City should identify obvious barriers proactively.

K.36Barrier Priority

Priority should consider:

Safety

Severity

Number of people potentially affected

Frequency of use

Essential-service impact

Availability of alternative

Ease of correction

Cost

K.37High-Cost Barrier

May still be:

K.38Low-Cost Barrier

Should not remain unresolved for years because:

K.39Easy Fix

Fix.

K.40Structural Fix

Plan.

K.41Temporary Accommodation

Provide where appropriate while:

is pending.

K.42Temporary Means Temporary

Record:

K.43Ramp Board Forever

Not long-term accessibility strategy.

K.44Door Held by Staff

May be accommodation.

It is not equivalent to:

K.45"Just Call Us"

May be accommodation.

It should not automatically be:

K.46Barrier Removed

Only when:

the underlying accessibility obstacle has been materially corrected or eliminated.

K.47Barrier Mitigated

Different.

K.48Barrier Deferred

Different.

K.49Barrier Accepted

Could occur where removal is:

and a defensible alternative is provided.

K.50Acceptance Requires Explanation

Not:

too hard.

K.51Barrier Age

Track.

K.52Oldest High-Priority Barrier

Publish.

K.53Repeat Barrier

Track where the same problem:

K.54Repair That Fails Repeatedly

Needs:

K.55Accessibility Confidence

Where information incomplete:

Use:

High

Moderate

Low

Unknown

K.56Unknown Accessibility

Not:

K.57Building Accessibility

Every major public facility should be reviewed as a:

complete journey.

K.58Facility Journey

Could include:

Public information

Transit arrival

Parking

Drop-off

Exterior path

Curb

Entrance

Door

Interior route

Counter

Waiting

Elevator

Washroom

Meeting room

Emergency exit

K.59Accessible Parking

Consider:

K.60Accessible Space Without Accessible Route

Incomplete.

K.61Drop-Off

Can be important where parking is:

K.62Exterior Route

Consider:

K.63Door Opener

Needs to:

K.64Equipment Installed

Not same as:

K.65Door Weight

Matters.

K.66Threshold

Matters.

K.67Entrance Mat

Can create barrier.

K.68Temporary Sign

Can create barrier.

K.69Furniture

Can create barrier.

K.70Garbage Bin

Can create barrier.

K.71Snow

Can create barrier.

K.72Interior Route

Keep:

K.73Service Counter

Provide accessible:

where appropriate.

K.74Queue

Accessibility includes:

K.75Seating

Provide where appropriate.

K.76Long Standing Queue

Can be barrier.

K.77Queue Number

May help.

K.78Audio-Only Queue Announcement

Can exclude.

K.79Visual-Only Queue Announcement

Can exclude.

K.80Multi-Channel

Better.

K.81Washroom

An accessible building with no usable accessible washroom can still fail:

K.82Washroom Review

Consider:

K.83Storage

Do not use accessible washroom as:

K.84Elevator

Operational reliability matters.

K.85Elevator Outage

Needs:

K.86"Accessible Except Elevator Is Broken"

Means:

K.87Facility Closure

If essential accessible route fails:

Consider whether service must:

K.88Heritage Building

Heritage status may complicate:

It does not make accessibility irrelevant.

K.89Alternative Design

Explore.

K.90Existing Building

May require staged improvement.

K.91New Building

Should not knowingly build:

K.92Capital Renovation

Opportunity to remove:

K.93Do Not Rebuild Barrier

Core rule.

K.94Asset Register Connection

Every public-facing asset should connect with:

K.95Capital Plan Connection

Barrier removal should connect with:

K.96One Street, One Plan

Accessibility included.

K.97Streets and Sidewalks

Public accessibility extends outside buildings.

K.98Sidewalk Network

A curb ramp is useful only if:

Can break:

K.100Sidewalk Condition

Consider:

K.101Utility Pole

Can obstruct.

K.102Patio

Can obstruct.

K.103Snowbank

Can obstruct.

K.104Construction Sign

Can obstruct.

K.105Temporary Barrier

Still barrier.

K.106Curb Ramp

Review:

K.107Curb Ramp Pointing Into Traffic

Not successful design.

K.108Crosswalk

Accessibility includes:

K.109Pedestrian Signal

Consider accessible:

features where required and appropriate.

K.110Crossing Time

Needs to reflect:

K.111Fast Walker Assumption

Can exclude.

K.112Refuge Island

May help.

K.113Median

Can also create barrier if poorly designed.

K.114Tactile Warning

Use according to applicable standards and design practice.

K.115Bicycle Infrastructure

Should not create unexpected barriers for:

K.116Shared Space

Needs careful:

where appropriate.

K.117Street Furniture

Place intentionally.

K.118Bench

Can improve accessibility.

K.119Bench Location

Matters.

K.120Rest Interval

Important for some residents.

K.121Shade

Can be accessibility factor during:

K.122Lighting

Can support:

K.123Glare

Can create:

K.124Wayfinding

Should be:

K.125Sign Font

Readable.

K.126Contrast

Readable.

K.127Placement

Reachable and visible.

K.128Construction Accessibility

Construction does not suspend:

K.129Temporary Detour

Needs:

K.130"Sidewalk Closed, Use Other Side"

Only works if resident can:

K.131Construction Detour Audit

For major projects.

K.132Contractor Responsibility

Include accessibility in:

K.133Temporary Walkway

Maintain.

K.134Mud

Can create barrier.

K.135Gravel

Can create barrier.

K.136Cable Ramp

Can create barrier.

K.137Excavation Plate

Can create barrier.

K.138Construction Communication

Provide:

K.139Business Access

Maintain where practical.

K.140Winter Accessibility

Winter is not:

K.141Snow Clearing

Accessibility service.

K.142Curb Ramp

Can be cleared sidewalk surrounded by:

K.143Accessible Parking

Snow storage should not consume:

K.144Transit Stop

Must remain reasonably:

K.145Crosswalk Button

Needs:

K.146Sidewalk Width

Snow narrows.

K.147Winter Route

Measure actual:

K.148Snowbank at Intersection

High-impact barrier.

K.149Windrow

Can trap:

K.150Melt and Refreeze

Creates:

K.151Winter Barrier Register

Could flag:

K.152Do Not Map Vulnerable Residents

Map:

K.153Priority Routes

Could include:

K.154Priority Does Not Mean Other Areas Ignored

No.

K.155Winter Restoration Standard

Define expected:

K.156Weather Severity

Context.

K.157Service Standard

Still measure.

K.158Severe Storm

Can explain delay.

It should not erase:

K.159Winter Accessibility Metric

Possible:

High-priority routes restored

Curb ramps blocked

Accessible parking blocked

Transit stops inaccessible

Repeat complaints

Restoration time

K.160Complaint Count Alone

Not enough.

K.161Proactive Inspection

Useful.

K.162Transit

Accessible transit is a complete:

K.163Transit Journey

Find schedule

Reach stop

Wait

Board

Ride

Communicate stop

Exit

Reach destination

K.164Accessible Vehicle

Not enough if:

K.165Accessible Stop

Not enough if:

K.166Accessible Schedule

Not enough if:

K.167Journey Failure

Measure.

K.168Transit Information

Provide:

routes.

K.169Smartphone

Should not be only route.

K.170Real-Time Information

Useful.

K.171Not Substitute for Published Schedule

No.

K.172Stop Announcement

Support multiple:

K.173Driver Assistance

Training.

K.174Mobility Device

Operational procedures.

K.175Service Animal

Appropriate policies.

K.176Support Person

Appropriate policies.

K.177Fare Payment

Should not require inaccessible:

K.178Cashless System

Needs accessible alternatives where appropriate.

K.179Transit Disruption

Accessible notification.

K.180Detour Stop

Needs accessible:

K.181Specialized Transportation

If applicable:

Measure separately from:

K.182Conventional Accessibility

Specialized service should not become excuse to leave ordinary service:

K.183Recreation

Accessible recreation means more than:

K.184Mainstream Access

Residents should be able to participate in ordinary programs where:

K.185Adaptive Recreation

Important.

K.186Do Not Segregate by Default

No.

K.187Registration

Accessible.

K.188Facility

Accessible.

K.189Change Room

Accessible.

K.190Washroom

Accessible.

K.191Equipment

Accessible.

K.192Instruction

Accessible.

K.193Communication

Accessible.

K.194Outdoor Recreation

Accessibility still applies, but does not mean:

every natural trail must be physically accessible to every person.

K.195Honest Trail Information

Important.

K.196Trail Classification

Could identify:

K.197"Accessible Trail"

Should mean something.

K.198Do Not Use Vague Label

No.

K.199Adaptive Equipment

Could improve participation.

K.200Borrow / Rent

Consider.

K.201Local Private Providers

Do not duplicate healthy adaptive-equipment market unnecessarily.

K.202Partnership

Could expand access.

K.203Park Accessibility

Consider:

K.204Accessible Playground

Does not require every component:

K.205Inclusive Design

Seek meaningful participation.

K.206Playground Surface

Matters.

K.207Transfer Platform

May help.

K.208Seating for Caregiver

Can matter.

K.209Sensory Environment

Can matter.

K.210Quiet Options

Can matter in some programs.

K.211Recreation Communication

State:

K.212Registration Form

Do not ask unnecessary diagnosis.

K.213Functional Accommodation

Ask.

K.214Assistance Request

Should be easy.

K.215No Public Disclosure

Protect.

K.216Events

Municipal events should include accessibility at:

K.217Event Accessibility Checklist

Could include:

Site route

Parking / drop-off

Seating

Stage visibility

Sound

Captioning / interpretation where appropriate

Washrooms

Vendors

Food service

Emergency exit

Weather plan

K.218Accessible Seating

Do not place:

by default.

K.219Companion Seating

Consider.

K.220Stage

Speaker access matters too.

K.221Performer Accessibility

Same.

K.222Vendor Booth

Should not block:

K.223Temporary Cable

Manage.

K.224Outdoor Grass

May create barrier.

Provide alternative routes or surfaces where practical.

K.225Public Meeting

Accessibility is democratic infrastructure.

K.226Meeting Notice

Accessible.

K.227Agenda

Accessible.

K.228Report

Accessible.

K.229Room

Accessible.

K.230Microphone

Accessible.

K.231Participation Process

Accessible.

K.232Remote Participation

Can improve access.

K.233Remote Only

Can exclude others.

K.234Hybrid

Can provide flexibility where workable.

K.235Captioning

Consider for public meetings.

K.236Sign-Language Interpretation

Provide where required or appropriately requested.

K.237Advance Request

Can help arrange accommodation.

K.238Last-Minute Need

Respond reasonably.

K.239Presentation Time Limit

May require accommodation.

K.240Written Submission

Alternative.

K.241Recorded Submission

Potential alternative where practical.

K.242Phone Submission

Potential alternative.

K.243Public Participation

Should not depend on:

K.244Council Chamber

Complete journey.

Accessible.

K.246Speaker Position

Accessible.

K.247Washroom

Accessible.

K.248Emergency Egress

Accessible planning.

K.249Documents

An accessible public meeting with inaccessible reports remains:

K.250Digital Accessibility

Digital accessibility begins before:

K.251Website

Needs:

K.252Keyboard

Resident should not require:

for essential service.

K.253Focus Indicator

Visible.

K.254Form Label

Programmatically connected.

K.255Placeholder

Not substitute for:

K.256Error Message

Should explain:

K.257Time Limit

Can create barrier.

K.258Extend

Where appropriate.

K.259CAPTCHA

Can create barrier.

K.260Alternative

Provide.

K.261Colour

Do not rely on:

K.262Contrast

Adequate.

K.263Text Size

Usable.

K.264Zoom

Should not destroy service.

K.265Responsive Design

Useful.

K.266Mobile-Friendly

Does not mean:

K.267Screen Reader

Test important journeys.

K.268Automated Tool

Useful but incomplete.

K.269Human Testing

Required for important services.

K.270Lived-Experience Testing

Valuable.

K.271Compensate Expertise

Where residents provide repeated specialized accessibility testing, compensation may be appropriate.

K.272Do Not Exploit Lived Experience

No.

K.273PDF

Use:

where applicable.

K.274Scanned Document

Avoid as only accessible version.

K.275Historical Scan

May remain archive.

Provide accessible alternative or assistance where needed and practicable.

K.276Complex Map

Provide:

where appropriate.

K.277Chart

Provide:

K.278Video

Caption.

K.279Audio

Transcript where appropriate.

K.280Livestream

Accessible features where practical.

K.281Social Media

Official accessibility obligations do not disappear because platform is:

K.282Alternative Channel

Provide.

K.283Digital Vendor

Must support accessibility.

K.284Vendor Says Accessible

Verify where important.

K.285Accessibility Conformance Report

May help.

K.286It Is Not Proof of Real Journey

No.

K.287Test Essential Tasks

Examples:

Pay bill

Register program

Apply permit

Read agenda

Submit complaint

Find emergency notice

K.288Task Completion

More meaningful than:

K.289Digital Accessibility Debt

Track.

K.290Legacy System

May require:

K.291Do Not Pretend Legacy Excuses Permanent Barrier

No.

K.292Procurement

Accessibility should be part of purchasing before:

K.293Procurement Accessibility Screen

Ask:

Who will use it?

What accessibility standard applies?

What tasks matter?

Has it been tested?

What known exceptions exist?

Who fixes defects?

What is remediation timeline?

K.294Lowest Bid

Not sufficient if product is:

K.295Demo

Include accessible-user scenarios.

K.296Procurement Specification

Should not be written so vaguely that accessibility is:

K.297Contractual Obligation

Use where appropriate.

K.298Remediation

Define.

K.299Vendor Update

Could introduce new barrier.

Review.

K.300Renewal

Accessibility performance should inform:

K.301Physical Procurement

Same principle.

K.302Furniture

Can create barrier.

K.303Kiosk

Can create barrier.

K.304Ticket Machine

Can create barrier.

K.305Payment Terminal

Can create barrier.

K.306Self-Service Device

Needs accessible:

where appropriate.

K.307Accessible Counter After Construction

More expensive than:

K.308Capital Projects

Accessibility should appear at:

Concept

Design

Procurement

Construction

Commissioning

Post-Occupancy Review

K.309Concept

Ask:

Who might be excluded by this design?

K.310Design

Apply appropriate:

K.311Procurement

Make requirements:

K.312Construction

Inspect.

K.313Commissioning

Test.

K.314Post-Occupancy

Ask:

Does it work in real life?

K.315Drawing Review

Not enough.

K.316Installed Condition

Matters.

K.317Change Order

Should not quietly remove:

to save cost.

K.318Value Engineering

Accessibility should not become:

K.319If Accessibility Scope Changes

Require:

K.320Temporary Construction Service

Maintain reasonable accommodation.

K.321Capital Accessibility Checklist

For major public-facing project:

StageQuestion
ConceptHas complete journey been considered?
DesignAre barriers addressed?
ProcurementAre requirements contractual?
ConstructionIs accessible design being installed correctly?
CommissioningHas complete route been tested?
OperationAre features maintained and available?

K.322Maintenance

Accessibility feature that does not work is:

K.323Door Opener

Maintenance.

K.324Elevator

Maintenance.

K.325Lift

Maintenance.

K.326Accessible Washroom Fixture

Maintenance.

K.327Pedestrian Signal

Maintenance.

K.328Tactile Surface

Maintenance.

K.329Website Form

Maintenance.

K.330Captioning System

Maintenance.

K.331Maintenance Request

Accessibility-critical failure should have:

K.332Repeat Failure

Root cause.

K.333Preventive Maintenance

Use for accessibility-critical equipment where:

K.334Accessibility Is Operations

Not just capital.

K.335Emergency Information

Emergency communication must reach people through:

K.336Siren Alone

May exclude.

K.337Text Alone

May exclude.

K.338Smartphone Alert Alone

May exclude.

K.339Multi-Channel

Prefer.

K.340Emergency Website

Accessible.

K.341Emergency PDF

Do not make inaccessible PDF only source.

K.342Evacuation

Consider people requiring:

K.343Emergency Planning

Should include disability and accessibility expertise.

K.344No Public Vulnerability Map

Never.

K.345Assistance Registry

If considered:

High privacy and operational threshold.

K.346Registering

Cannot become guarantee City may not:

K.347Alternative

Community and household preparedness can reduce reliance on:

K.348Emergency Shelter

Accessible journey.

K.349Shelter Entrance

Accessible.

K.350Washroom

Accessible.

K.351Sleeping Arrangement

Accessible.

K.352Communication

Accessible.

K.353Service Animals

Plan.

K.354Medication Refrigeration

May require health/emergency partner planning.

K.355Power-Dependent Devices

Consider emergency charging strategy where appropriate.

K.356Public Safety

Accessibility intersects with:

K.357Emergency Caller

May have communication disability.

K.358Alternate Communication

Consider.

K.359Right Responder

Accessibility should be part of:

K.360Police Interaction

Different professional framework.

K.361Fire Interaction

Different.

K.362Paramedic

Different.

K.363City Support Service

Different.

K.364Training

Should clarify roles.

K.365Housing

The City does not control every housing outcome.

But municipal policy can consider:

K.366Accessible Unit

Must be defined.

K.367"Barrier-Free"

Do not use vaguely.

K.368Feature List

Useful.

K.369Housing Help Desk

Should be accessible itself.

K.370Suite Information

Accessible.

K.371Forms

Accessible.

K.372In-Person Help

Available.

K.373Builder Education

Could include accessibility and:

K.374Accessibility and Seniors

Overlap.

But not all seniors:

K.375Accessibility and Youth

Overlap.

But youth accessibility should consider:

K.376Accessibility and Families

Strollers are not disability devices.

But good universal design often helps:

K.377Universal Design

Can improve broad usability.

K.378But Disability Accommodation Still Needed

Universal design does not eliminate all:

K.379Downtown

Accessibility is economic:

K.380Storefront Entry

Often private responsibility.

K.381City Can Help

Through:

K.382Do Not Publicly Shame Business

Provide:

K.383Outdoor Patios

Should preserve accessible:

K.384Retail Displays

Same.

K.385Sandwich Boards

Same.

K.386Downtown Snow

High accessibility importance.

K.387Civic Square

Should be designed for:

K.3882nd Avenue Pilot

Accessibility is a decision gate.

K.389Pilot Should Measure

Accessible route continuity

Transit impacts

Accessible parking impacts

Crossing safety

Business access

K.390Do Not Treat Accessibility as Post-Pilot Fix

No.

K.391River and Trails

Provide honest:

K.392Not Every Trail Can Be Fully Accessible

Correct.

K.393But Information Can Be

K.394Accessible River Experience

Could include:

where feasible.

K.395Outdoor Ladder

Explore.

Try.

Learn.

Borrow.

Rent.

Join.

Own.

Accessibility can be considered at each:

K.396Business Services

Start-Up Desk should offer:

K.397Ten-Day Standard

Accommodation-related delay should not be used to:

K.398Applicant Delay

Do not classify City accessibility failure as:

K.399Shop Local

Public directory should be:

K.400Business Accessibility Information

Could be voluntarily listed.

K.401Do Not Certify Private Business Accessible

Unless City has verified against a defined:

K.402Self-Reported

Label.

K.403Community Partners

Partnership agreements can include accessibility expectations proportional to:

K.404Small Volunteer Group

Do not impose impossible bureaucracy.

K.405Major City-Funded Service

Higher expectation.

K.406Grant Application

Accessible.

K.407Grant-Funded Event

Accessibility can be part of:

where lawful and proportionate.

K.408Faith Organizations

Same neutral public-purpose standards.

K.409No Ideological Accessibility Test

Accessibility is about:

K.410Procurement Partner

Same.

K.411Grey County

Coordinate where complete journey crosses:

responsibilities.

K.412No Wrong Government

Accessibility should survive:

K.413Example

A City sidewalk leads to:

Resident should not have to solve:

before barrier is routed.

K.414Warm Handoff

Use.

K.415Responsibility Still Clear

Yes.

K.416Ontario

Provincial services may be part of resident journey.

City can:

K.417Canada

Same.

K.418SON

Accessibility relationship should be:

where shared projects arise.

K.419Do Not Assume City Standard Governs Another Government

No.

K.420Shared Project

Agree standards together.

K.421Public Consultation

Accessibility consultation should not itself be:

K.422Notice

Accessible.

K.423Location

Accessible.

K.424Online Tool

Accessible.

K.425Phone Option

Consider.

K.426Written Option

Consider.

K.427Support Person

Accommodate.

K.428Communication Support

Accommodate.

K.429Transportation Barrier

Consider.

K.430Compensation

When City repeatedly relies on residents with disabilities as technical accessibility experts:

Consider:

K.431Do Not Expect Unlimited Free Lived-Experience Labour

No.

K.432Advisory Group

Can help.

K.433Advisory Group Is Not Rubber Stamp

No.

K.434Advisory Group Is Not Engineering Certification

Also no.

K.435Lived Experience

Complements:

review.

K.436Staff Training

Accessibility training is:

K.437Training Completion

Not proof of:

K.438Training Outcome

Look for:

K.439New Employee

Train according to role.

K.440Manager

Different needs.

K.441Web Publisher

Different needs.

K.442Procurement Staff

Different needs.

K.443Snow Operations

Different needs.

K.444Facility Staff

Different needs.

K.445Event Planner

Different needs.

K.446Role-Based Training

Better than:

K.447Accessibility Contact

Residents should know:

where to report a barrier or request accommodation.

K.448One Entry Point

Useful.

K.449Department Routing

Internal.

K.450No Wrong Door

Apply.

K.451Accommodation Request

Should not require:

K.452"I cannot use this form"

Enough to begin:

K.453Staff Response

Listen.

Clarify functional barrier.

Offer reasonable route.

K.454Do Not Argue Diagnosis

No.

K.455Do Not Demand Proof Automatically

No.

K.456Do Not Promise Impossible Accommodation

Also.

K.457Reasonableness

Assess.

K.458Safety

Matters.

K.459Other Rights

Matter.

K.460Undue Hardship

Legal concept should be handled through appropriate:

K.461No Casual Use of Phrase

Do not say:

undue hardship

because accommodation is:

K.462Accommodation Record

Protect privacy.

K.463Public Scorecard

Aggregate.

K.464Complaint

Different from accommodation request.

K.465Accessibility Complaint

Track.

K.466Complaint Resolution

Track.

K.467Repeat Complaint

Track.

K.468Complaint Upheld

Could be useful internally.

K.469Complaint Count

Not sole outcome.

K.470Low Complaint Count

May mean:

K.471Resident Experience Survey

Can help.

K.472Survey Itself

Must be accessible.

K.473Do Not Require Digital Survey Only

No.

K.474Privacy

Do not require disclosure of disability category when not necessary.

K.475Optional Demographic Data

Use only where useful and protected.

K.476Small Samples

Protect re-identification.

K.477Data Does Not Need Diagnosis to Find Barrier

Often.

K.478Measurement

Accessibility Scorecard should focus on:

K.479Headline Measures

Possible:

Known barriers

High-priority barriers

Barriers removed

Temporary mitigations

Barrier age

Public facilities reviewed

Accessible routes reviewed

Winter barriers

Transit accessibility

Digital issues

Public meeting accessibility

Accommodation resolution

Procurement reviews

Capital reviews

Repeat barriers

K.480Do Not Add Them Into One Score

No.

K.481Barrier Count

Can rise because:

K.482That Can Be Progress

Yes.

K.483Barrier Removal

Better outcome measure.

K.484But Raw Removal Count Can Be Gamed

Removing 100 minor barriers does not automatically outweigh:

K.485Priority Weight

Show separately.

K.486High-Priority Barrier Resolution

Important.

K.487Barrier Age

Important.

K.488Oldest High-Priority Barrier

Important.

K.489Complete Journey Review

Activity.

K.490Journey Pass

Outcome if properly defined.

K.491Journey Failure Point

Useful.

K.492Temporary Accommodation Rate

Context.

K.493Permanent Removal Rate

Better.

K.494Facility Accessibility

Do not assign one Green label if:

K.495Traffic Lights

Green

Defined complete journey functioning with no known material barrier or appropriate accommodation in place while minor remediation proceeds.

Amber

Known barrier or reliability issue requiring action.

Red

Material barrier prevents or seriously limits access to important service.

Grey

Accessibility not sufficiently assessed.

K.496Grey Is Not Accessible

Again.

K.497Unknown Building

Assess.

K.498Unknown Digital Service

Test.

K.499Unknown Winter Route

Inspect.

K.500Accessibility Dashboard

Could include:

MeasureBaselineCurrentTarget / StandardStatus
Known barriers
High-priority barriers
Barriers removed
Oldest high-priority barrier
Facilities journey-reviewed
Digital journeys reviewed
Winter priority barriers
Repeat barriers

K.501Cost

Barrier removal costs should connect with:

K.502Low-Cost Fix

Track.

K.503Capital Fix

Track.

K.504Maintenance Fix

Track.

K.505Digital Fix

Track.

K.506Accommodation Cost

Can be:

K.507No "Accessibility Is Too Expensive" Without Complete Cost

Compare:

K.508Early Design Often Cheaper

Generally.

K.509But Do Not Claim Every Accessibility Feature Saves Money

No.

K.510Some Improvements Cost More

Still may be:

K.511Complete Cost

Include.

K.512Funding

Possible:

K.513Grant

Not reason to install poor solution.

K.514Accessibility Grant

Still requires:

K.515Volunteers

Can help identify barriers.

K.516Volunteers Should Not Replace

K.517Youth

Civic Corps could assist with:

under appropriate supervision.

K.518Youth Should Not Certify

K.519Student Mapping

Can identify:

K.520Professional Verification

For technical claims.

K.521AI

AI may help:

K.522AI Is Not Accessibility Certification

No.

K.523Automated Scanner

Same.

K.524AI Alt Text

Review.

K.525AI Captioning

Can help.

K.526High-Stakes Communication

Review accuracy.

K.527Voice Interface

Can improve access.

K.528Voice-Only Interface

Can exclude.

K.529Chatbot

Can improve access.

K.530Chatbot-Only Service

Can exclude.

K.531Human Route

Preserve.

K.532Biometrics

Not accessibility shortcut by default.

K.533Facial Recognition

Do not justify as:

without high-threshold review.

K.534Authentication

Accessibility matters.

K.535One-Time Code

May create barrier.

K.536Smartphone MFA

May create barrier.

K.537Alternative

Provide where practical and secure.

K.538Security and Accessibility

Should be designed together.

K.539Security Is Not Excuse for Inaccessible Authentication

No.

K.540Accessibility Is Not Excuse for Weak Security

Also.

K.541Procurement Trade-Off

Solve.

K.542Accessibility in Emergency Procurement

Emergency can reduce:

It does not make accessibility irrelevant.

K.543Temporary Workaround

May be necessary.

K.544Review After Emergency

Required.

K.545Records

Accessibility decisions should be documented.

K.546Barrier Register

Institutional record.

K.547Accommodation Details

Protected.

K.548Public Reporting

Aggregate.

K.549Technical Reports

Preserve.

K.550Lived-Experience Findings

Preserve with:

K.551Photos of Barriers

Useful.

K.552Do Not Photograph Person Unnecessarily

Focus on:

K.553Accessibility Map

Could map:

where accurate.

K.554Map Is Information

Needs updates.

K.555Incorrect Accessibility Map

Can be worse than:

K.556Verify.

K.557"Accessible"

Do not use as vague marketing label.

K.558Better

Describe actual features.

K.559Example

Instead of:

Accessible Trail

say:

Firm surface, approximately 1.8 metres wide, maximum reported grade X, benches every Y metres, accessible washroom at entrance

where verified and useful.

K.560Feature-Based Information

Lets resident decide.

K.561No False Guarantee

Good.

K.562Public Facility Directory

Could include verified accessibility features.

K.563Private Business Directory

Accessibility information may be:

Label.

K.564No Municipal Certification Without Standard

No.

K.565Accessibility and Design Excellence

Accessible can also be:

K.566Do Not Treat Accessibility as Add-On Appearance

Integrate.

K.567Wayfinding

Universal.

K.568Seating

Universal.

K.569Shade

Universal.

K.570Clear Language

Universal.

K.571Reliable Website

Universal.

K.572Snow-Free Curb

Universal.

K.573Good accessibility often improves service for:

K.574But Do Not Erase Disability-Specific Need

Universal benefit should not become reason to avoid:

K.575Accessibility Decision Gate

Before launching significant public service ask:

Can the resident find it?

Understand it?

Reach it?

Enter it?

Navigate it?

Use it?

Communicate?

Complete the transaction?

Use necessary supporting facilities?

Exit safely?

Follow up?

K.576The Whole-Journey Test

If one critical answer is:

No

the journey is not:

K.577The Alternative Test

Is a reasonable accessible alternative available now?

K.578The Temporary Test

Is the alternative temporary or are we quietly accepting permanent inequality?

K.579The Independence Test

Can the resident use the service independently where reasonably possible?

K.580The Dignity Test

Does the accommodation unnecessarily single out, embarrass or burden the resident?

K.581The Non-Digital Test

Can someone without a smartphone or reliable Internet still obtain the essential service?

K.582The Winter Test

Does the route still work in February?

K.583The Maintenance Test

Does the accessibility feature actually work today?

K.584The Procurement Test

Was accessibility considered before the contract was signed?

K.585The Capital Test

Are we removing known barriers or rebuilding them?

K.586The Communication Test

Can the resident receive and provide information in a usable form?

K.587The Emergency Test

Will this person receive the warning and be able to act on it?

K.588The Privacy Test

Are we asking for more disability or medical information than needed?

K.589The Evidence Test

Have we tested the actual journey rather than only reading the specification?

K.590The Lived-Experience Test

Have people who actually encounter this type of barrier had a meaningful chance to identify what the technical review missed?

K.591The Professional Test

Where technical certification is required, has a qualified professional reviewed it?

K.592The Cost Test

What is the cost of fixing the barrier now, and what happens if we defer it?

K.593The Repeat Test

Have we fixed this before and, if so, why did it fail again?

K.594The No-Wrong-Door Test

If the barrier belongs to another department or government, does the resident receive a usable handoff?

K.595The Reverse Test

Would we consider this level of access acceptable if we personally depended on it every day?

K.596The Future Test

Are we building something the next Council will immediately have to retrofit?

K.597Anti-Gaming Rule One

Do not call a building accessible because:

K.598Rule Two

Do not call a route accessible because:

if they do not connect.

K.599Rule Three

Do not call a service accessible because:

K.600Rule Four

Do not call temporary accommodation:

K.601Rule Five

Do not call accessibility review:

K.602Rule Six

Do not call training completion:

K.603Rule Seven

Do not call automated website score:

K.604Rule Eight

Do not call vendor accessibility claim:

K.605Rule Nine

Do not colour unknown accessibility:

K.606Rule Ten

Do not reduce barrier count by:

K.607Rule Eleven

Do not reclassify high-priority barrier as low priority to:

K.608Rule Twelve

Do not restart barrier age clock because:

K.609Rule Thirteen

Do not count mitigation and permanent correction as:

K.610Rule Fourteen

Do not count one repaired door opener as multiple:

K.611Rule Fifteen

Do not remove accessibility feature during value engineering without:

K.612Rule Sixteen

Do not wait until construction completion to discover:

K.613Rule Seventeen

Do not rebuild known barrier during:

K.614Rule Eighteen

Do not let contractor place signs, fencing or material across accessible route without:

K.615Rule Nineteen

Do not call sidewalk clear if:

K.616Rule Twenty

Do not call accessible parking available if:

K.617Rule Twenty-One

Do not call transit accessible because:

if stop cannot be reached.

K.618Rule Twenty-Two

Do not call recreation accessible because:

K.619Rule Twenty-Three

Do not call trail accessible based on:

K.620Rule Twenty-Four

Do not call public meeting accessible because:

if documents or participation process fail.

K.621Rule Twenty-Five

Do not make accommodation request itself:

K.622Rule Twenty-Six

Do not demand medical diagnosis when:

is sufficient.

K.623Rule Twenty-Seven

Do not treat disability information as:

K.624Rule Twenty-Eight

Do not publish small-group accessibility data that risks:

K.625Rule Twenty-Nine

Do not require smartphone to:

K.626Rule Thirty

Do not require app installation merely to:

K.627Rule Thirty-One

Do not use inaccessible CAPTCHA without:

K.628Rule Thirty-Two

Do not call mobile-friendly:

K.629Rule Thirty-Three

Do not call accessible document:

without actual structure.

K.630Rule Thirty-Four

Do not use colour alone to communicate:

K.631Rule Thirty-Five

Do not use AI-generated alt text or captions without appropriate:

K.632Rule Thirty-Six

Do not allow chatbot to become only access route to:

K.633Rule Thirty-Seven

Do not use facial recognition or biometrics as supposed accessibility convenience without:

K.634Rule Thirty-Eight

Do not buy inaccessible system because:

K.635Rule Thirty-Nine

Do not renew inaccessible vendor without:

K.636Rule Forty

Do not use grant deadline to bypass:

K.637Rule Forty-One

Do not call public event accessible because:

if route is unusable.

K.638Rule Forty-Two

Do not segregate accessible seating unnecessarily.

K.639Rule Forty-Three

Do not publish accessible-facility information without:

K.640Rule Forty-Four

Do not certify private business accessibility based only on:

K.641Rule Forty-Five

Do not impose inaccessible consultation process on people being asked about:

K.642Rule Forty-Six

Do not expect residents with disabilities to provide unlimited specialist advice:

K.643Rule Forty-Seven

Do not treat lived experience as:

K.644Rule Forty-Eight

Do not treat engineering certification as complete substitute for:

K.645Rule Forty-Nine

Do not treat legal compliance as proof of:

K.646Rule Fifty

Do not treat practical inconvenience as automatically:

Keep legal and operational findings:

K.647Rule Fifty-One

Do not use accessibility to justify collecting unnecessary:

K.648Rule Fifty-Two

Do not create vulnerability maps under the banner of:

K.649Rule Fifty-Three

Do not use accessible-service data for:

K.650Rule Fifty-Four

Do not let election-year timing determine:

K.651Rule Fifty-Five

Do not rush decorative accessibility projects while:

K.652Rule Fifty-Six

Do not prioritize photo opportunity over:

K.653Rule Fifty-Seven

Do not build accessibility feature without:

K.654Rule Fifty-Eight

Do not call failed accessibility equipment:

until restored.

K.655Rule Fifty-Nine

Do not call February accessibility:

without winter review.

K.656Rule Sixty

Do not accept:

We have never received a complaint

as proof that:

K.657First 30 Days

Establish:

Accessibility Operating Baseline.

K.658First 30-Day Review

Identify:

Existing accessibility plans

Known barriers

Accessibility advisory structure

Major public buildings

High-volume digital services

Winter priority routes

Transit accessibility interfaces

Capital projects already in design

Major procurements underway

Outstanding accessibility complaints

K.659Do Not Start With Giant New Study

First:

find what City already knows.

K.660Existing Barrier Lists

Reconcile.

K.661Existing Capital Plans

Review.

K.662Existing Digital Audits

Review.

K.663Existing Resident Feedback

Review.

K.664First 30-Day Quick Fixes

Could include:

K.665Quick Fix Must Be Real

Not cosmetic.

K.666First 60 Days

Create unified:

Accessibility Barrier Register.

K.667First 60 Days

Define:

K.668First 60 Days

Identify top:

ten high-impact barriers

for early action.

K.669Number Ten

Illustrative, not mandatory quota.

K.670First 100 Days

Apply complete-journey review to selected:

K.671First 100 Days

Integrate accessibility into:

K.672First 100 Days

Publish first:

Accessibility Baseline Scorecard.

K.673Year One

Primary objective:

Know the barriers and stop rebuilding them.

K.674Year One Actions

Establish register.

Fix obvious high-impact barriers.

Review capital designs.

Review major digital journeys.

Improve winter route monitoring.

Improve accommodation access.

Establish public reporting.

K.675Year One Success

Not:

barrier count went down immediately.

K.676Year One Could Find More Barriers

That may reflect:

K.677Year Two

Primary objective:

Build accessibility into normal operations.

K.678Year Two Integration

Accessibility embedded in:

K.679Year Two

Focus on oldest:

barriers.

K.680Year Two Digital

Remediate high-volume digital journeys.

K.681Year Two Procurement

Track accessibility defects in:

K.682Year Two Winter

Use first-year barrier data to improve:

K.683Year Three

Primary objective:

Address structural barriers that cannot be solved through easy operational fixes.

K.684Structural Projects

Could include:

K.685Year Three

Review whether barrier register is producing:

or merely documenting problems.

K.686Paperwork Audit

If bureaucracy exceeds benefit:

Simplify.

K.687Year Three

Test complete journeys again after:

K.688Year Three

Review recurring accessibility failures.

K.689Year Four

Primary objective:

Finish what should be finished, publish what remains, and hand the system forward.

K.690Year Four Audit

Publish:

Four-Year Accessibility Audit.

K.691Audit Should Answer

What barriers were known at baseline?

What new barriers were discovered?

How many high-priority barriers were removed?

What remains?

What is oldest?

What temporary accommodations remain temporary?

Which public buildings were journey-tested?

Which digital services were improved?

Which winter routes improved?

Which capital projects removed barriers?

Which projects accidentally created barriers?

Which procurement decisions improved accessibility?

Which vendors failed accessibility commitments?

Which accommodations repeatedly exposed system problems?

K.692Name the Most Important Barrier Removed

K.693Name the Oldest High-Priority Barrier Remaining

K.694Name the Most Important Temporary Accommodation Still Awaiting Permanent Correction

K.695Name a Capital Project That Removed Multiple Barriers

K.696Name a Capital Project Where Accessibility Was Caught Before Construction

K.697Name a Project Where a Barrier Was Accidentally Created

If applicable.

K.698Name What Was Done to Correct It

K.699Name the Most Important Winter Accessibility Improvement

K.700Name the Most Persistent Winter Barrier

K.701Name the Most Improved Digital Journey

K.702Name the Largest Remaining Digital Accessibility Problem

K.703Name an Inaccessible Procurement Prevented Before Purchase

If applicable.

K.704Name a Vendor Required to Remediate

If applicable.

K.705Name a Service Where Lived Experience Changed Design

K.706Name a Service Where Technical Review Corrected a Misunderstanding

K.707Name a Public Meeting Improvement

K.708Name an Emergency Information Improvement

K.709Name a Recreation Accessibility Improvement

K.710Name the Most Important Accessible Outdoor Opportunity Added

K.711Name the Most Important Barrier the City Could Not Reasonably Remove

Where applicable.

K.712Explain Alternative

K.713Name the Largest Remaining Unfunded Accessibility Liability

K.714Handoff

The next Council should receive:

Barrier Register

Barrier priorities

Oldest unresolved barriers

Temporary accommodations

Capital accessibility projects

Digital accessibility issues

Winter accessibility data

Procurement accessibility issues

Pending complaints

Major upcoming decisions

K.715No Accessibility Surprise

The next Council should not discover:

The accessible entrance has been broken for two years.

K.716Or

The winter route disappears every February.

K.717Or

The new website cannot be used by keyboard.

K.718Or

The City's new permit system requires a smartphone.

K.719Or

A known barrier was rebuilt during renovation.

K.720Or

The only accessible washroom is used for storage.

K.721The Accessibility Standards Commitment

Owen Sound should commit to:

Use the Complete Accessible Journey as the City's operating accessibility standard.

Recognize that an accessible feature is not the same as an accessible journey.

Treat applicable accessibility and human-rights law as required minimums while continuing to measure practical resident usability.

Do not treat accessibility as charity, special treatment or a separate side program.

Recognize accessibility as part of service quality, infrastructure, public participation and dignity.

Consider physical, digital, communication, transportation, procedural, information, winter and emergency barriers.

Focus accommodation discussions on functional barriers and needs rather than unnecessary medical diagnosis.

Collect health or disability information only where genuinely necessary and appropriately protected.

Map resident journeys from finding information through travel, arrival, entry, service use, supporting facilities, exit and follow-up.

Recognize that one broken stage can make the entire service inaccessible.

Maintain a City-wide Accessibility Barrier Register.

Give each material barrier a stable ID, owner, priority, status and correction plan.

Distinguish known barriers, temporary accommodations, mitigations and permanent removals.

Never report temporary accommodation as permanent barrier removal.

Track barrier age so old problems do not disappear through staff or departmental change.

Prioritize barriers according to severity, safety, essential-service impact, frequency and availability of alternatives.

Fix simple high-impact barriers quickly where possible.

Plan structural corrections transparently where immediate removal is not feasible.

Use public and protected accessibility information appropriately.

Treat Unknown accessibility as Unknown rather than Accessible.

Review public buildings through the full journey from information and arrival through parking, entrance, interior route, counter, washroom and exit.

Do not call a building accessible merely because it has a ramp.

Maintain door openers, elevators, lifts, washrooms and other accessibility equipment as operational infrastructure.

Treat accessibility-feature failure as a service problem requiring appropriate maintenance priority.

Use renovation and capital renewal to remove known barriers rather than reconstruct them.

Never knowingly rebuild a barrier during a public capital project without explicit, defensible reason.

Connect the Accessibility Barrier Register to the Asset Register and capital plan.

Treat sidewalks, crossings, curbs, signals, benches, lighting and public space as accessibility infrastructure.

Evaluate route continuity rather than isolated curb ramps.

Ensure temporary patios, signs, utilities and street furniture preserve usable pedestrian routes.

Design construction detours for actual accessible use rather than merely posting Sidewalk Closed signs.

Include temporary accessibility in construction specifications and inspections.

Treat winter accessibility as a core municipal operating responsibility.

Measure whether curb ramps, accessible parking, transit stops and priority routes remain usable after snow events.

Do not call a sidewalk cleared when the resident cannot get through the snowbank at the intersection.

Use weather severity as context without using weather to erase measurable accessibility failures.

Maintain priority winter routes based on actual public need while continuing to serve the broader network.

Treat transit accessibility as the complete journey from information and stop access through boarding, riding and reaching the destination.

Do not call a transit system accessible merely because the vehicle has accessible equipment.

Provide transit information through accessible digital and non-digital channels.

Avoid smartphone-only fare or schedule access without reasonable alternatives.

Keep conventional transit accessibility separate from specialized transportation so one does not become an excuse for deficiencies in the other.

Treat recreation accessibility as participation in ordinary community life rather than creating one isolated adaptive program and declaring success.

Provide adaptive recreation and equipment where demand, safety and public value support it.

Do not automatically segregate residents with disabilities from mainstream programs.

Describe trail characteristics honestly so residents can decide whether an experience is suitable.

Do not label trails Accessible without a defined basis.

Use parks, benches, shade, washrooms, playground design and routes to support broader public participation.

Plan municipal events for accessible arrival, seating, communication, washrooms, vendors and emergency exit.

Do not isolate accessible seating unnecessarily.

Make public meetings accessible in their information, location, participation process and digital options.

Provide accessible agendas, reports and public-submission routes.

Use hybrid or alternative participation methods where they meaningfully improve access.

Provide communication supports according to applicable law, request and practical need.

Do not make public participation depend exclusively on high-speed Internet.

Treat public documents as part of the accessible journey.

Design municipal websites and digital systems for keyboard, screen-reader and low-vision use as well as ordinary mouse and touchscreen use.

Use headings, labels, meaningful focus, accessible forms, clear error messages and sufficient contrast.

Do not rely on colour alone to communicate essential information.

Review timeouts, CAPTCHA and authentication for accessibility.

Do not call a site accessible merely because an automated scanner reports a high score.

Test important resident tasks manually and with relevant assistive technologies.

Use lived-experience testing where it provides meaningful additional insight.

Compensate repeated specialist lived-experience work where appropriate rather than assuming it should always be volunteered.

Make PDFs and other public documents accessible where required and practical.

Provide usable alternatives when historical scanned material cannot immediately be fully remediated.

Caption public video and provide transcripts where appropriate.

Do not make an app the only route to essential municipal services.

Do not make private social-media platforms the only source of important municipal information.

Build accessibility into technology procurement before vendors are selected.

Require vendors to explain known accessibility limitations and remediation responsibilities.

Test essential tasks rather than accepting marketing claims.

Use accessibility performance in renewal decisions.

Apply the same principle to physical equipment such as kiosks, payment devices, furniture and self-service terminals.

Include accessibility at concept, design, procurement, construction, commissioning and post-occupancy stages of capital projects.

Do not remove accessibility scope through value engineering without explicit review.

Test installed conditions rather than assuming a compliant drawing guarantees an accessible completed project.

Maintain accessibility infrastructure after construction.

Design emergency information for multiple sensory and communication needs.

Do not rely on one warning method.

Include accessibility in emergency shelter, evacuation, communication and transportation planning.

Do not create public maps of vulnerable residents as an emergency-accessibility shortcut.

Apply strong privacy and operational review to any emergency assistance registry.

Include accessibility in the design of Right Responder and other community-safety initiatives.

Recognize that police, fire, paramedic, health and municipal support services have different professional responsibilities.

Consider accessibility and aging-in-place issues within the Housing Help Desk while accurately distinguishing municipal authority from housing-market outcomes.

Define Accessible Unit and similar housing terminology rather than using vague labels.

Keep municipal housing information and forms accessible.

Recognize that accessibility improvements often assist seniors, families and temporarily injured residents without erasing disability-specific needs.

Treat downtown accessibility as both public-realm access and economic participation.

Keep public sidewalks usable when patios, displays and events occupy downtown space.

Do not publicly certify private businesses as accessible without a defined verification standard.

Label business accessibility information as self-reported where it is self-reported.

Make accessibility a decision gate in Civic Square and 2nd Avenue pilot design.

Include accessible route continuity, parking, transit and crossings in public-realm pilot measurement.

Provide accurate accessibility information for river, trail and outdoor experiences.

Use the Explore, Try, Learn, Borrow, Rent, Join, Own recreation ladder in ways that lower accessibility barriers where feasible.

Make the Start-Up Desk, Shop Local directory and business-support information accessible.

Do not classify City-created accessibility delay as applicant delay.

Include proportionate accessibility expectations in grants and partnerships where the City is funding a public-facing service.

Do not impose unnecessary paperwork on small community groups while ignoring accessibility in major publicly funded contracts.

Apply the same neutral accessibility expectations to faith, cultural and other community organizations performing publicly supported activities.

Use No Wrong Government when accessibility journeys cross City, County, Ontario or federal responsibilities.

Provide residents a warm handoff rather than forcing them to solve the jurisdictional map.

Respect Saugeen Ojibway Nation as a distinct government and agree appropriate accessibility standards collaboratively in shared projects.

Make accessibility consultations themselves accessible.

Offer multiple ways to participate.

Do not require residents with disabilities to provide unlimited free technical labour to the City.

Use advisory bodies and lived experience to improve decisions without treating them as substitutes for professional technical certification.

Use professional technical review without treating it as a substitute for lived experience.

Make staff training role-specific.

Do not measure accessibility success merely by training completion.

Measure whether barriers, repeated failures and accommodation problems actually improve.

Give residents one understandable route to report accessibility barriers and request accommodations.

Do not require residents to know which department owns the barrier.

Treat I Cannot Use This Service as enough to begin a practical accommodation discussion.

Do not demand medical proof automatically.

Do not promise accommodations the City cannot safely or lawfully provide.

Protect accommodation records as personal information.

Use aggregate public reporting.

Keep accessibility complaints distinct from accommodation requests and barrier records.

Recognize that low complaint counts do not prove accessibility.

Use accessible surveys and avoid unnecessary disability-identification questions.

Protect small samples from re-identification.

Measure barriers, barrier age, high-priority resolution, repeat barriers, winter conditions, digital journeys and resident experience.

Do not collapse accessibility into one composite score.

Recognize that discovering more barriers can be institutional progress rather than evidence that accessibility suddenly worsened.

Measure removal of important barriers rather than only raw counts.

Use Green, Amber, Red and Grey according to defined complete-journey standards.

Use Grey when accessibility has not been sufficiently assessed.

Connect accessibility costs to the Complete Cost framework.

Show temporary, operating, maintenance, digital and capital accessibility costs honestly.

Do not claim that every accessibility investment produces financial savings.

Recognize that some investments are worthwhile or required even where they increase direct cost.

Use volunteers and Civic Corps participants to assist with observation and mapping where appropriate, but do not substitute them for paid operational or professional work.

Do not allow youth or volunteers to certify technical or legal accessibility compliance.

Use AI and automated accessibility tools as assistants, not as certification.

Review AI-generated alt text, captions and accessibility recommendations before relying on them.

Preserve human service routes when using voice assistants, chatbots and other digital accessibility tools.

Do not use biometrics or facial recognition as routine accessibility shortcuts.

Design security and accessibility together rather than treating either as an excuse to ignore the other.

Document accessibility decisions, barrier history and technical reviews while protecting individual accommodation information.

Use barrier photographs without unnecessarily photographing identifiable residents.

Maintain accessibility maps and facility descriptions accurately.

Prefer specific feature-based descriptions over vague claims that a location is Accessible.

Do not certify private accessibility conditions the City has not verified.

Use universal design to improve broad public usability while continuing to provide individual accommodation where necessary.

Apply the Complete Accessible Journey test before launching significant public services.

Ask whether the resident can discover, understand, reach, enter, navigate, use, communicate, complete, exit and follow up.

Ask whether temporary accommodation is quietly becoming permanent inequality.

Ask whether the accessible route works during winter.

Ask whether installed accessibility equipment is actually functioning today.

Ask whether accessibility was considered before procurement and construction.

Ask whether the emergency communication will actually reach the people who need it.

Ask whether the City is collecting more disability or medical information than necessary.

Ask whether the actual journey has been tested rather than assumed.

Ask whether the City has listened to lived experience without treating lived experience as a substitute for technical certification.

Ask whether a technical review has been informed by real use.

Ask whether a known barrier has been fixed before it becomes a repeat failure.

Ask whether another government or department can receive a resident through a warm handoff rather than a dead end.

Apply the same accessibility standard when the result is politically inconvenient.

Never colour an unknown or partially functioning journey Green.

Never reduce the barrier register by deleting or reclassifying unresolved barriers for reporting purposes.

Never use legal compliance as the only proof of a good resident experience.

Never treat resident inconvenience alone as proof of legal noncompliance either.

Keep legal, technical and operational findings precise.

Use the first 30 days to locate existing accessibility information and establish the operating baseline.

Use the first 60 days to create a unified Accessibility Barrier Register and identify high-impact early actions.

Use the first 100 days to apply complete-journey reviews to selected high-volume physical and digital services.

Use Year One to know the barriers and stop rebuilding them.

Use Year Two to integrate accessibility into ordinary procurement, maintenance, capital, winter operations and digital publishing.

Use Year Three to address structural and long-standing barriers and test whether the accessibility system is producing actual action rather than paperwork.

Use Year Four to publish a Four-Year Accessibility Audit and hand the remaining barriers to the next Council openly.

Name the barriers that remain rather than allowing a political transition to reset the clock.

Apply the final accessibility standard to every municipal service and asset: Can the resident complete the whole journey, not merely encounter one accessible feature along the way?

The accessibility framework can therefore be reduced to ten rules:

Measure the whole journey.

Fix the barrier, not the statistic.

Build accessibility in before construction, procurement and launch.

Keep winter in the accessibility conversation.

Keep digital and non-digital access together.

Protect dignity and privacy.

Test real use, not only specifications.

Maintain what makes the service accessible.

Publish what remains unresolved.

Never rebuild a barrier you already knew existed.

The City should eventually be able to answer a very simple question:

Can a resident who encounters a disability-related barrier still participate fully in ordinary municipal life?

Not theoretically.

Not with perfect weather.

Not only if they know the right employee.

Not only if someone opens the door for them.

Not only if they own the newest smartphone.

In ordinary life.

That is the standard.

An accessible feature is not the same as an accessible journey. Measure the whole journey. Remove the barrier. Maintain the solution. Keep dignity at the centre.

← Appendix J: Privacy, Information and Digital Governance StandardsAppendix L: Procurement, Local Opportunity and Canadian Capacity Standards →